Blurring the Line Between Researcher and Researched in Interview Studies: A Feminist Practice?
Public DepositedYost, Megan R., and Jennifer F. Chmielewski. Blurring the Line Between Researcher and Researched in Interview Studies: A Feminist Practice?
Psychology of Women Quarterly 37, no. 2 (2013): 242-250.
There is a rich history of feminist critique of research methods in the social sciences, with feminist scholars noting an androcentric bias and a focus on the values and concerns of the dominant group (Harding, 1987; Reinharz, 1992). The experiences and concerns of women and girls have historically been ignored in traditional social science research or studied only in relation to men (Harding, 1987). As a result, feminists have expressed the need for methods that respect and empower women and that accept women’s experiences as legitimate sources of knowledge (Campbell & Wasco, 2000). Qualitative research has been discussed as a feminist research method because women’s voices can be heard on their own terms and the traditional hierarchy between researcher and participant can be flattened (Campbell & Wasco, 2000; Oakley, 1988; Sprague & Kobrynowicz, 2003).
For more information on the published version, visit Sage Journal's Website.
MLA citation style (9th ed.)
. 2013. dickinson.hykucommons.org/concern/generic_works/90bff9c1-d733-47ae-b107-0fda9ed4527a?locale=en. Blurring the Line Between Researcher and Researched In Interview Studies: A Feminist Practice?.APA citation style (7th ed.)
(2013). Blurring the Line Between Researcher and Researched in Interview Studies: A Feminist Practice?. https://dickinson.hykucommons.org/concern/generic_works/90bff9c1-d733-47ae-b107-0fda9ed4527a?locale=enChicago citation style (CMOS 17, author-date)
Blurring the Line Between Researcher and Researched In Interview Studies: A Feminist Practice?. 2013. https://dickinson.hykucommons.org/concern/generic_works/90bff9c1-d733-47ae-b107-0fda9ed4527a?locale=en.Note: These citations are programmatically generated and may be incomplete.