Perceived Control and the Optimistic Bias: A Meta-Analytic Review
Public DepositedFor more information on the published version, visit Taylor and Francis's Website.
People consistently believe that negative events are less likely to happen to them than to others. Research suggests a relationship between this optimistic bias and perceived control such that the greater control people perceive over future events, the greater their optimistic bias. We conducted a meta-analysis of 27 independent samples to quantify the size of this relationship and examine what variables moderated the relationship. Greater perceived control was significantly related to greater optimistic bias, but this relationship was moderated by participant nationality, student status, risk status, and the type of optimistic bias measure used. We discuss the findings in the context of primary versus secondary control.
Klein, Cynthia T. F., and Marie Helweg-Larsen. Perceived Control and the Optimistic Bias: A Meta-Analytic Review.
Psychology and Health 17, no. 4 (2002): 437-446. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0887044022000004920
MLA citation style (9th ed.)
. 2002. dickinson.hykucommons.org/concern/generic_works/cb5b8048-11c5-420f-9c97-f0e6510d6711?q=2002. Perceived Control and the Optimistic Bias: A Meta-analytic Review.APA citation style (7th ed.)
(2002). Perceived Control and the Optimistic Bias: A Meta-Analytic Review. https://dickinson.hykucommons.org/concern/generic_works/cb5b8048-11c5-420f-9c97-f0e6510d6711?q=2002Chicago citation style (CMOS 17, author-date)
Perceived Control and the Optimistic Bias: A Meta-Analytic Review. 2002. https://dickinson.hykucommons.org/concern/generic_works/cb5b8048-11c5-420f-9c97-f0e6510d6711?q=2002.Note: These citations are programmatically generated and may be incomplete.