Work

Domestication and Prehistoric Distribution

Public Deposited

Planella, María Teresa, María Laura López, and Maria Christina Bruno. Domestication and Prehistoric Distribution. In State of the Art Report on Quinoa Around the World in 2013, edited by Didier Bazile, Daniel Bertero, and Carlos Nieto, 29-41. Rome: FAO and CIRAD, 2015.

Maria Bruno is a professor of Anthropology and Archaeology at Dickinson College.

This published version is made available on Dickinson Scholar with the permission of the publisher. For more information on the published version, visit Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nation's Website. https://www.fao.org/documents/card/fr/c/3638200e-1fbb-4d7e-a359-d8f582b1d082/

This study reports on the current state of knowledge regarding the history of Chenopodium quinoa in four Andean countries: Argentina, Bolivia, Chile and Peru (Figure 1). The cultural environments in which quinoa was domesticated, adopted, exchanged and/or cultivated in ancient times, were reconstructed using archaeological data and, in particular, on the basis of archaeobotanical research by many specialists in these countries, as well as ethnohistorical sources and observations of the cultural continuities in communities that still produce quinoa using traditional methods. The study begins with a review of the domestication of Chenopodium. It has been shown that the morphological features of archaeological seeds are the outcome of human manipulation over at least 3 000 years. This indicates that groups of huntergatherers in the Late Archaic Period (8000–3000 B.C.) in the Andean region subsisted on wild Chenopodium and applied selection, protection, treatment and transplantation processes that induced changes in its structure resulting in the characteristic features of domesticated quinoa. The study then investigates archaeobotanical records from the Late Archaic to the Inca period. It outlines the distinctive morphological attributes in each region, the ecological conditions where quinoa was cultivated, the zones of origin and access routes, the various ways it was used, and quinoa’s role in the sociopolitical processes of the time. Finally, the study draws attention to the benefits (or necessity) of continuing regional research, optimizing methodologies and exchanging information and developments among researchers seeking answers to the many unsolved problems, including the presence of seeds not specifically identified as having traits that could match the early stages of the domestication process.

FAO encourages the use, reproduction and dissemination of material in this information
product. Except where otherwise indicated, material may be copied, downloaded and
printed for private study, research and teaching purposes, or for use in non-commercial
products or services, provided that appropriate acknowledgement of FAO as the source
and copyright holder is given and that FAO’s endorsement of users’ views, products or
services is not implied in any way.
© FAO, 2015


MLA citation style (9th ed.)

López, María Laura, Bruno, Maria C, and Planella, María Teresa. Domestication and Prehistoric Distribution. . 2015. dickinson.hykucommons.org/concern/generic_works/4b0dc8e6-a5b9-487e-a90e-2a805975d499.

APA citation style (7th ed.)

L. M. Laura, B. M. C, & P. M. Teresa. (2015). Domestication and Prehistoric Distribution. https://dickinson.hykucommons.org/concern/generic_works/4b0dc8e6-a5b9-487e-a90e-2a805975d499

Chicago citation style (CMOS 17, author-date)

López, María Laura, Bruno, Maria C., and Planella, María Teresa. Domestication and Prehistoric Distribution. 2015. https://dickinson.hykucommons.org/concern/generic_works/4b0dc8e6-a5b9-487e-a90e-2a805975d499.

Note: These citations are programmatically generated and may be incomplete.

Relations

In Collection: