Work

Effects of Erotophobia on the Persuasiveness of Condom Advertisements Containing Strong or Weak Arguments

Public Deposited

Default work thumbnail

Individual differences in erotophobia affect the way people process sexually related information, such as information concerning safer sex. This study tests the hypothesis that people who are erotophobic are less likely to take the central route in information processing about sexual material as described by the elaboration likelihood model. Female college students (n = 94) were randomly assigned to view a condom advertisement containing either strong or weak arguments. Consistent with predictions, all women were more persuaded by the advertisement containing strong rather than weak arguments. However, erotophobic women were also relatively more persuaded by weak arguments than were erotophilic women. Erotophobia appears to interfere with central route processing of sexually related messages.

For more information on the published version, visit Taylor and Francis's Website.

Helweg-Larsen, Marie, and Constance Howell. Effects of Erotophobia on the Persuasiveness of Condom Advertisements Containing Strong or Weak Arguments. Basic and Applied Social Psychology 22, no. 2 (2000): 111-117. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1207/S15324834BASP2202_4


MLA citation style (9th ed.)

Howell, Constance, and Helweg-Larsen, Marie. Effects of Erotophobia On the Persuasiveness of Condom Advertisements Containing Strong Or Weak Arguments. . 2000. dickinson.hykucommons.org/concern/generic_works/25154029-109b-409f-9283-2d8e30438750.

APA citation style (7th ed.)

H. Constance, & H. Marie. (2000). Effects of Erotophobia on the Persuasiveness of Condom Advertisements Containing Strong or Weak Arguments. https://dickinson.hykucommons.org/concern/generic_works/25154029-109b-409f-9283-2d8e30438750

Chicago citation style (CMOS 17, author-date)

Howell, Constance, and Helweg-Larsen, Marie. Effects of Erotophobia On the Persuasiveness of Condom Advertisements Containing Strong Or Weak Arguments. 2000. https://dickinson.hykucommons.org/concern/generic_works/25154029-109b-409f-9283-2d8e30438750.

Note: These citations are programmatically generated and may be incomplete.

Relations

In Collection: